Posted by: drgeophysics | March 16, 2020

Global Pandemic

A broadly useful list of resources about the coronavirus (COVID-19) can be found here:

and here
Looking at the coronavirus (COVID-19) doubling times and using 3 days for the US, with the number of cases recorded yesterday in the US, I’m guessing in between 54 to somewhat over 60 days most people will be exposed.  It’s all about social distancing and flattening the infection curve now.  Some discussion of helpful responses are here:

The Lancet has an article that links pre existing medical conditions to mortality using Chinese observations from the COVID-19 pandemia.   For children and younger people, such as yourself, these rates are quite low.  Here is a link to a video review of the study:

A daily review by a physician in the UK.  Extremely helpful and informative:

Web sites monitoring this can be found at the urls:
It seems that the global community is responding with such social distance measures and increased caution.  It seems that the pandemic and community transmission phase have arrived.   I’m quite concerned about countries that are in a triage situation.
Stay calm, safe, increase and maintain social distance, and keep washing your hands.
Posted by: drgeophysics | April 6, 2018

Some fun resources related to Radar based technologies.

I’ve been using a bit of inSAR, SAR and LIDAR and other radar systems and wanted to share some interesting and fun sites.  These systems, especially where combined with UAVs are changing the world.   Here are some fun links imo:

 Build your own small radar system:
Are you interested in building and testing your own imaging radar system? MIT Lincoln Laboratory offers this 3-week course in the design, fabrication, and test of a laptop-based radar sensor capable of measuring Doppler, range, and forming synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images.

How small can these get?  Really small.

This small, cheap, fast, and powerful LiDAR promises to open up new applications we haven’t even imagined yet. And it’s due in a few years.


Need more background regarding radar systems–MIT has you covered.
This set of 10 lectures (about 11+ hours in duration) was excerpted from a three-day course developed at MIT Lincoln Laboratory to provide an understanding of radar systems concepts and technologies to military officers and DoD civilians involved in radar systems development, acquisition, and related fields.

I am not supporting this, but found a corporate training opportunity.  There are YouTube videos showing the final system the cost seems high, but I had fun looking over the web site and associated YouTube videos.  Some software details can be found at this site.
Learn how radar systems work by reviewing applied electromagnetics, circuit design, and antennas. Then build your own and perform field experiments including ranging, Doppler, and SAR imaging.
Posted by: drgeophysics | October 19, 2017

Real time earthquake monitoring sites–an incomplete resource.

As everyone else in geophysics I’ve become involved in seismic monitoring.  Some URLs related to real-time or near real-time monitoring sites are listed below.  I’ll continue to add to this as needed and hope you might find these helpful.

Texas TexNet Seismic Monitoring

Pacific Northwest Seismic Network

Cascadia Tremor Activity and Map

Southern California Earthquake Data Center

California Integrated Seismic Network

Oklahoma Geological Survey: Recent Earthquakes

PASEIS: Pennsylvania Seismic Network



Posted by: drgeophysics | September 18, 2017

September 26, Stanislov Petrov day


The olds well remember how close the US and USSR came by nuclear war in the 1980’s.   Many people of this generation still have nightmares recalling preparing for the aftermath of such as almost unimaginable nightmare.  For younger people who didn’t live it, this dangerous global situation is simply unimaginable imo.

Lt. Col. Stanislav Petrov was a 44 year old Soviet military officer on the front lines of this world and received a message on September 26, 1983 that the United States had launched five nuclear missiles towards Moscow.  For those of this age, nightmares about the results of such a strike are still common, this was an unimaginable scenario, now fully verified, checked and rechecked, or at least it seemed.  He had 20 minutes to determine what to do.   The bright red “Launch” button in front of him was activated and alarm sirens sounded throughout his command.   So would end the world.

Petrov was unusual for the commanders in this branch of the military, he was one of the few officers who had received a civilian education,  and reasoned that this was most likely a false alarm despite the high quality of the alarm and the multiple checks already applied.   Other false alarms include this 1979 event, and this 1983 NATO activity.

The world is very, very, very lucky that Lt. Col Petrov was on duty that evening.  His decision and action, not to launch,  took true courage, which he displayed.  Details from him, including an interview can be found here.

When you enjoy September 26, 2017, be sure to think of the late Stanislov Petrov (Sept 9, 1939-May 19, 2017).  We enjoy this world and day because of his actions:  A single person saving the world late in the evening, using his education and best thinking.

Want more? Oh yeah, there’s a movie too.

Posted by: drgeophysics | July 28, 2017

100 year anniversary of the Silent Parade

1917 Silent Protest Parade photograph Public Domain


July 28th, 2017 marks the 100 year anniversary of the Silent Parade.   This was the first such protest in New York history and an incredibly important event in the history of the Civil Rights movement.  In New York City, perhaps as many as 10,000 people marched down Fifth Avenue in silent,  strong and unambiguous response to the bloody East Saint Louis riots that occurred during May and July of 1917.    For me, the courage of these individuals inspires us to always look towards a more just and better future, regardless of the obstacles or challenges of the moment.  I hope you enjoy the day and take time to honor these Americans.

A Google Doodle recording this event can be viewed here.

Posted by: drgeophysics | April 12, 2017

Happy День Космонавтики

I hope you enjoy the day–Spring has arrived and the International Day of Astronauts along with it.


Posted by: drgeophysics | July 22, 2016

Temblor, like it or not, it is a thing.

The word temblor associated with reporting of earthquakes seems to be a thing, have you encountered it?  Temblor was also a Batgirl villain (in the Kid’s WB animated TV series), but that’s not what we’re talking about.

Need more details about the English language word “temblor” usage associated with earthquakes; please check this fascinating Word Routes contribution.

Don’t like the use of this word -> temblor?  Here is something you might enjoy reading.

Looking for a single-word definition of temblor?  This link has you covered.

Word detective jumps into temblor waters (be sure to read the comments), with an enjoyable read with this link.

When all else fails–check the Wiki page.  Even Sonicfrog got into this.

Hope you are enjoying the summer!



Sorry for the gap in posts!  Geophysics continues to be central to everything. Lately I’ve spent some time living in Berlin and continue working in the areas of induced seismicity and seismic monitoring.  I enjoyed Berlin, it is one of the world’s great cities, and Berlin reminded me somewhat of New York City in the 1980s.  What a place.

The USGS has released their hazard assessment for induced earthquakes in several key regions of the United States.  As usual they have excellent resources; check this URL:

The Open File Report (OFR) (there never seem to be enough TLAs, Three Letter Acronyms in the world I guess) can be found here:

Seismic hazard communication is important.  This web-based insurance estimation (?) tool is really unexpected and does not incorporate the new induced database (it uses the older USGS seismic hazard assessment for natural events), but you might find the presentation interesting:

The downturn in the energy industry has also focused my attention on longer term guesses at the energy framework globally over the next couple of decades.

Having experienced directly the downturn of the 1980’s I think that this latest crash was just as bad.  The energy industry trends in booms and busts, but this was somewhat extreme given the desire of a major energy player to preserve market share.  The price of oil has probably stabilized, although the shale gale (vast amounts of natural gas and gas liquids resulting from horizontally drilling, hydrofracturing, and more accurate geophysical characterization) will probably continue to decrease the natural gas prices through this year.  BP had a couple of excellent web-based events.  Their energy outlook through 2035 documents can be found here:

If you wish to jump directly to their download pages for the Energy economics, statistical review use this URL:

BP Magazine reduced this interesting outlook to 7 points at this URL:

On an unrelated topic I was shocked at the Brexit vote.  I’ll spare you the campy you tube videos about this, but honestly still cannot believe the outcome.   IHS and other groups have been trying to present and incorporate economic scenarios related to Brexit to energy professionals, but we are collectively off the map at this point.  There are so many questions that I was interested to note that CarbonBrief has summarized 94 unanswered questions related to energy policy and climate related to Brexit: Find their list here:

On an unrelated (dogs!) topic, I enjoyed this idea greatly:

The Atlantic article is charming imo; check it here:

Hope you are enjoying the summer.

Posted by: drgeophysics | July 9, 2015

More induced seismicity resources.

I hope you are enjoying the summer. Things are especially busy this summer for reasons unknown.

For those who might be living in a cave somewhere, the investigation of background variation in earthquake frequency related to produced water injection has become a very hot topic.   Some earlier posts covered this, but here is another one.

An excellent USGS reports about the subject, focused on Oklahoma, can be found here.

An easily understood overview regarding these events can be found here.

A USGS OpenFile report: Incorporating induced seismicity in the 2014 US National Seismic Hazard Model–Results of the 2014 workshop and sensitivity studies. Can be found here.

A series of presentations and other documents from an excellent induced seismicity workshop, coincident with a major winter weather event in Oklahoma (!), can be found here. 

An important Science article, by William Ellsworth, can be found here. Be sure to carefully review this and his excellent and accessible presentations that can easily be found on the web.

A Virginia Tech resource related to induced earthquakes can be found here.

The Kansas Geological Survey (an excellent organization), has induced seismicity related information that can be found here.

As earlier posted, but very useful and helpful, the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory site discussing induced seismicity can be found here.

The induced seismicity wiki can be found here.

To prove that people are following this activity, take some time and read this popular press article about “Underground Weather”.

Predicting earthquakes–that should be easy eh?  IMO, if the appropriate tensor nature of the earth system,  multi-scale physics, heterogeneity, and anisotropy  are properly incorporated it should be a piece of cake.

Posted by: drgeophysics | April 20, 2015

Earthquake information on the web.

To help you find immediate information about earthquakes please find some sites I check routinely.

Map of seismographs in the US.

Earthquakes observed in the last two weeks (IRIS site).

Select a seismic station and view seismograph data for last 48 hours.

Determine the seismographs closest to your site using this handy table.  They using the Station name examine the earthquake records directly using their station name.  This is the tables of all sites, including the states located within.

Examine latest 24 hour vertical seismograph data (the up and down earth motion of the seismograph) for every Transportable array seismograph.

USGS 1 Day, Magnitude 2.5+ Worldwide earthquake list and data.

Earthquake instant notification service (computer and text messages from USGS).

USGS Earthquake related products and services.

USGS PAGER service.

GFZ (German) map of global seismicity.  Does not include smaller events in North America that are seen in the USGS and IRIS sites.

List of recent earthquakes from GFZ (German).

Does not include smaller events in North America that are seen in the USGS and IRIS sites.

Seismograph not close enough?  Need one closer?  How about working with IRIS and a local school to install one!

 That would give you a local seismograph right in your neighborhood and inspire kids to look at tiny wiggles; like true geophysicists!  What could possibly be more inspiring?
This link describes the atmospheric sensors useful in detecting air shocks.  Please note that there is another post on this site just looking at nuclear monitoring using atmospheric data.  The link below describes the hardware added to some seismographs to detect airshocks.

There is a lot of information out there a function of the faster than exponential technological change we live within.  Good luck!  Enjoy the spring.

Older Posts »